tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Oct 26 18:48:54 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC: A Failure to Communicate

Alan Anderson ([email protected])

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: KLBC: A Failure to Communicate
• Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 21:48:35 -0400
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]>

ja' lay'tel SIvten:
> The only objects of {ghaj} I found are: batleH, joQ, tlham, nIn,  
> Hov, pegh,
> De' pegh, pIch, and butlh.  The word {HoSghaj} implies that {HoS}  
> may have been
> an object.  While some of these objects are abstract (pIch, pegh,  
> De' pegh,
> tlham, ?HoS), none is an event.

Nor are any a food, or a vehicle, or a person.  I don't see that as a  
reason to restrict us from saying {be'nI' vIghaj} or {chatlh  
vIghaj}.  What about an event would disqualify it from being the  
object of a verb?

-- ghunchu'wI'

• References:
  • Re: KLBC: A Failure to Communicate
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: Re: KLBC: A Failure to Communicate
• Next by Date: Re: Klingon WOTD: ngotlh (verb)
• Previous by thread: Re: KLBC: A Failure to Communicate
• Next by thread: Re: KLBC: A Failure to Communicate
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level