tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Oct 20 10:04:26 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC: A Failure to Communicate

MorphemeAddict ([email protected])

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: KLBC: A Failure to Communicate
• Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 13:04:04 EDT

In a message dated 10/19/2006 11:20:07 PM Central Standard Time, 
[email protected] writes:

> I don't have any general prejudice against {ghajtaH}.
> I wouldn't use {ghaj} for "having a situation",
> though.
> I think you can only have things, not events.
> 

The only objects of {ghaj} I found are: batleH, joQ, tlham, nIn, Hov, pegh, 
De' pegh, pIch, and butlh.  The word {HoSghaj} implies that {HoS} may have been 
an object.  While some of these objects are abstract (pIch, pegh, De' pegh, 
tlham, ?HoS), none is an event.

lay'tel SIvten

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: KLBC: A Failure to Communicate
    • From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: So'wI' lowaH tera'ngan tej
• Next by Date: Re: KLBC: A Failure to Communicate
• Previous by thread: Re: KLBC: A Failure to Communicate
• Next by thread: Re: KLBC: A Failure to Communicate
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level