tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Oct 19 08:24:47 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Dilbert Comic in Klingon for 2006/10/16

Steven Boozer ([email protected])



pm5:
> >> Boss: "Really? Threats make you work all night?"
> >> pIn:  {'oH teH'a'? ram Hoch bIvumtaH 'e' DabuQlu'mo''a'?}

lay'tel SIvten:
> > Aside from changing the verb to {vIt}, the sentence with {teH} should have
> > its subject after the verb: {teH'a' 'oH?}, and in this case the subject
> > should probably omitted: {teH'a'?}.

Especially since {'oH} refers to a specific noun and not the previous 
statement as a whole.  For that of course we use {'e'} and {net}.  However 
since we can't say *{teH'a' 'e'?} - Okrand tells us that these two pronouns 
"are always treated as the object of the verb" (TKD 65f.) - {teH'a'?} it 
has to be.  If you feel uncomfortable not explicitly stating a subject in 
these type of conversational remarks, we have an example from ST5:

   KLAA:  qIpmeH Qatlh'a'?
          "[Is it] Difficult to hit?"
   VIXIS: Qatlhqu'.
          "[It is] Most difficult."

ghunchu'wI':
>>I think {qar'a'?} works well to express "Really?"

Even better, as I think I suggested myself yesterday.



--
Voragh
Ca'Non Master of the Klingons






Back to archive top level