tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Oct 09 08:14:24 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC: Translating Dilbert

MorphemeAddict ([email protected])

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: KLBC: Translating Dilbert
• Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 11:13:46 EDT

In a message dated 10/9/2006 8:44:08 AM Central Standard Time, 
[email protected] writes:

> Note that {Sov} takes the {0-} 'they-them' prefix
> because the object is plural ('methods'), but {luneH}
> needs the prefix {lu-} 'they-it', because its
> "object" is a single item, the verb {Sov}.
> 

Is there a canon example of {lu-} on {neH} like this?  All the instances I 
have have only {0-}, {vI-}, {Da-}, or {nuq-}.

lay'tel SIvten

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: KLBC: Translating Dilbert
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: KLBC: Translating Dilbert
• Next by Date: Re: KLBC: Translating Dilbert
• Previous by thread: Re: KLBC: Translating Dilbert
• Next by thread: Re: KLBC: Translating Dilbert
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level