tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Nov 05 07:16:45 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: A tangled knot of subordinate clauses

DloraH ([email protected])

• From: "DloraH" <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: A tangled knot of subordinate clauses
• Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 09:16:14 -0600
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• Thread-index: AccA5Isf4+UymeZCR9iSfWb86tCdJAACEyEg

When people overuse the word "thing", I enjoy pointing out that in my
dictionaries it states:
Scandinavian legislative or judicial body.


Dlorah


> : Doch vIjatlhlaw'pu'bogh Dayaj 'e' DaHar 'e' vISov
> 
> tlhIngan Hol jatlhtaHvIS vay', *Dochmey* jatlhbe', *mu'mey* jatlh.
> 
> To the best of my knowledge, the word {Doch} indicates things ...

• References:
  • RE: A tangled knot of subordinate clauses
    • From: "Agnieszka Solska" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: A tangled knot of subordinate clauses
• Next by Date: RE: A tangled knot of subordinate clauses
• Previous by thread: RE: A tangled knot of subordinate clauses
• Next by thread: RE: A tangled knot of subordinate clauses
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level