tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Jan 29 21:55:19 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: -be' or -Qo'? I forget what the acronym was for the front... lol

naHQun ([email protected])

• From: "naHQun" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: -be' or -Qo'? I forget what the acronym was for the front... lol
• Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 05:53:04 GMT

(as I often point out, I check my e-mail once a week
and this week I don't have enough time to check all of the mesages,
so forgive me if this has alrdy been pointed out...)

jatlh Philip Newton:
>{qamuSHa'Qo'} is "I refuse to mis-hate you"; {qamuSHa'be'} is 
>"I donot mis-hate you". See the difference?Both are correct, but
>they mean different things.You might also wish to consider simply
>saying {qamuS} - "I hate you".(I'd say that translating {muSHa'}
>as "love" obscures the real meaningof the Klingon root.)

-be', -Qo', and -Ha' are all rovers. As far as I know,
you can't use more than one same-type verb suffix. Can you?

~naHQun


___________________________________________________________________
Try Juno Platinum for Free! Then, only $9.95/month!
Unlimited Internet Access with 1GB of Email Storage.
Visit http://www.juno.com/value to sign up today!

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: -be' or -Qo'? I forget what the acronym was for the front... lol
    • From: Philip Newton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Philosophical translation
• Next by Date: Re: meyrI'Daq 'oHtaH gho'e'
• Previous by thread: Re: -be' or -Qo'? I forget what the acronym was for the front... lol
• Next by thread: Re: -be' or -Qo'? I forget what the acronym was for the front... lol
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level