tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Jan 29 22:27:21 2006
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: -be' or -Qo'? I forget what the acronym was for the front... lol
- From: Philip Newton <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: -be' or -Qo'? I forget what the acronym was for the front... lol
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 07:26:55 +0100
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=mAypspSvz+Nlbya1iSVhaioyW/zHy/C25AA58nQN9Ijq1ttNzAVzuqJEHfytPjYQmXWhdnjfF3hXOc0vE1qqosXtGQdhPiTaE7eMUB8h1BKjiJB5JtnvlScMlzJ0FLhsy34Rdw1YPqx8IJM4cVrXjwQnI9BTiRiVkxZX613tTaw=
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
On 1/30/06, naHQun <[email protected]> wrote:
> -be', -Qo', and -Ha' are all rovers. As far as I know,
> you can't use more than one same-type verb suffix. Can you?
I don't remember having seen anything definitive, but always assumed
that you could not only use multiple rovers on one verb, you could
even use the same rover multiple times, at least for {-be'} ... in
things such as, say, {jIHeghbe'qangbe'} "I am not ready not to die".
--
Philip Newton <[email protected]>
HovpoH 5241.55