tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Jan 25 01:23:20 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: HIvchuq

Philip Newton ([email protected])

From: Philip Newton <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: HIvchuq
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:23:06 +0100
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rnieQ6Yi/VGSeZBZbBkVLSM+ltcSFXusIMNj9hW/yU54jnDOwIgqVc0y/N2DUQGrEopGwQQp0zMcgc+/K70Rd5e0L/dV7crp7CQNKvUGuuTt6Eu+D+tlkJDWE2QWQTvZ0FlC9k2oMSHIPYVpcwBvQYijxJMdEWhyhLoR9JtxNzg=
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On 1/24/06, Steven Boozer <[email protected]> wrote:
> BTW, the text of CK and PK have also never been officially published
> AFAIK.  Would you have us discount all of that data?

Not the mapping of phonemes to symbols, since that's fairly
unambiguous for Klingon, given a good speaker pronunciation.

My main quibble was with word division, which (I would imagine) is not
usually well-expressed in speech -- it's more an artefact of the
written word. For example, why "lighthouse" but "light year" or
"light-year" in English?
--
Philip Newton <[email protected]>
HovpoH 5217.16

Follow-Ups:
- Re: HIvchuq
  - From: Terrence Donnelly <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: loy
  - From: "QeS 'utlh" <[email protected]>
- Re: loy
  - From: "Lieven Litaer" <[email protected]>
- Re: loy
  - From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
- Re: loy
  - From: Philip Newton <[email protected]>
- Re: HIvchuq
  - From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
- Re: HIvchuq
  - From: Philip Newton <[email protected]>
- Re: HIvchuq
  - From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Klingon at the Thanksgiving table - A month late...
Next by Date: Klingon WOTD: nuch (noun)
Previous by thread: Re: HIvchuq
Next by thread: Re: HIvchuq
Index(es):