tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jan 24 03:18:58 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: loy

Philip Newton ([email protected])

• From: Philip Newton <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: loy
• Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:18:17 +0100
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=JtpO9rQ611r0bqwEZUj9ilw+XugMFhh/OU1egHOwLlMXs1SMElKTWKd6m9lHQBvaz7iCJtyXjnyuc4h+h0R6WHFsgarJUWpBo0VPYbP4KI2PoVHoS0J6qj7eV+2rPRB+xgNkra/7WeZSBUfhvjxgCc7owwX29GdvBjqdyiWg+NQ=
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On 1/23/06, Steven Boozer <[email protected]> wrote:
>    chorghSaD qelI'qam HIvchuq'e' vInoH
>    Estimating attack range in 8,000 kellicams. (ST5)

Does that mean that {HIvchuq} is canon for "attack range"? I don't
have that in my wordlist (only {HIv} (v.) and {chuq} (n.) as separate
words).
--
Philip Newton <[email protected]>
HovpoH 5212.35

• References:
  • Re: loy
    • From: "QeS 'utlh" <[email protected]>
  • Re: loy
    • From: "Lieven Litaer" <[email protected]>
  • Re: loy
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: "my name is" (was Re: loy)
• Next by Date: Klingon WOTD: QIn (noun)
• Previous by thread: Re: loy
• Next by thread: Re: HIvchuq
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level