tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Oct 01 15:04:06 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

imperative with VS9 (-bogh)

MorphemeAddict ([email protected])

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: imperative with VS9 (-bogh)
• Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 18:03:13 EDT

In a message dated 2004-10-01 5:22:41 AM Eastern Daylight Time, 
[email protected] writes:

> >And the Klingon equivalent may be >yIleghbogh<.
> 
> But would it be understood as having the same meaning as "quod vide"? 
> Remember, too, that relative clauses (except for a couple of bizarre 
> examples) require head nouns. I just can't wrap my head around ??{Doch 
> yIleghbogh} "the thing which see".
> 
> QeS lagh
> 

le'qu' lo'vam 'e' vIchID.  DuH lo' 'e' vI'ang neH vIneH.  'ach chovnatlh 
qanob:  
"QeDmey Sar vIHaD vIneH, 'ach QIn yIleghbogh ngeHpu' vavwI' 'ej QInDaq *wa' 
QeD neH vIHaD 'e' chaw'* ghItlh."

jumqu'taH'a' chovnatlhvam?

lay'tel SIvten

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: imperative with VS9 (-bogh)
    • From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: tlhIngan Hol yejHaD
• Next by Date: Re: imperative with VS9 (-bogh)
• Previous by thread: Re: tlhIngan Hol yejHaD
• Next by thread: Re: imperative with VS9 (-bogh)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level