tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jul 22 05:18:16 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Klingon WOTD: qeD (v)

David Trimboli ([email protected])

• From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Klingon WOTD: qeD (v)
• Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 08:16:47 -0400
• References: <[email protected]>

From: "QeS lagh" <[email protected]>
> So {qI'} is the physical act of actually *signing* the treaty, rather than
> the more abstract act of becoming affected by a treaty? I had leant more
> towards the second definition, and I'd assumed that the actual act of
> signing would be given by <ghItlh>.


We don't know that.  We don't know exactly what kind of "sign" is meant by
{qI'}.  It might mean as many things as the English does, or it might not.

SuStel
Stardate 4557.1

• References:
  • Re: Klingon WOTD: qeD (v)
    • From: "QeS lagh" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Klingon WOTD: SIbI' (adv)
• Next by Date: Re: be' neH neHbe' be'
• Previous by thread: Re: Klingon WOTD: qeD (v)
• Next by thread: Re: {qI'} (was Klingon WOTD: qeD)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level