tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Jul 02 16:56:34 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: ghelmeH mu'tlhegh'e' Sayu'

ngabwI' ([email protected])

From: "ngabwI'" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: ghelmeH mu'tlhegh'e' Sayu'
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 19:55:51 -0400
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 8:21 AM
Subject: Re: ghelmeH mu'tlhegh'e' Sayu'

> *{nuq vIjatlh DaneH} seems simple enough, but it technically violates what
> we know about Klingon.  Until Okrand says otherwise, avoid it.

Thank you, SuStel. I was unaware of this rule. Saved Sa'HutwIj again. }}: )

--ngabwI'
Beginners' Grammarian
Klingon Language Institute
http://kli.org
HovpoH 701739.7

References:
- ghelmeH mu'tlhegh'e' Sayu'
  - From: Dar'Qang <[email protected]>
- Re: ghelmeH mu'tlhegh'e' Sayu'
  - From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: nuq vIjatlh DaneH
Next by Date: Re: ghelmeH mu'tlhegh'e' Sayu'
Previous by thread: Re: ghelmeH mu'tlhegh'e' Sayu'
Next by thread: Re: ghelmeH mu'tlhegh'e' Sayu'
Index(es):