tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Feb 24 12:10:22 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

[tlhIngan-Hol] Re: jIQaghqa'qu'taH

Steven Boozer ([email protected])

• From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
• Subject: [tlhIngan-Hol] Re: jIQaghqa'qu'taH
• Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 14:09:50 -0600
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>

At 07:50 PM Monday 2/23/2004, you wrote:
> > Odds are high that we won't get any more noun suffixes. (Although, in 
> KGT we
> > did get <<-oy>>, the suffix of endearment, but I suspect that was more 
> a nod
> > to Ann Crispin's book "Sarek" than anything else, since it's a vowel first
> > syllable, normally illegal in Klingon.)

DloraH:
>-oy comes from TKD.  Section 3.3.1 (addendum)

Documenting its use in "ST6: The Undiscovered Country" by Azetbur in a 
toast to her {vavoy}.



-- 
Voragh
Ca'Non Master of the Klingons 

• Prev by Date: [tlhIngan-Hol] Re: (tulwI') Hol chenmoHwI'
• Next by Date: [tlhIngan-Hol] Re: KLBC: default aspect?
• Previous by thread: [tlhIngan-Hol] Re: (tulwI') Hol chenmoHwI'
• Next by thread: [tlhIngan-Hol] Re: KLBC: default aspect?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level