tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Feb 11 16:42:26 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

DCKL translation question: argueing arguments

Lieven L. Litaer (Quvar) ([email protected])

• From: Lieven L. Litaer (Quvar) <[email protected]>
• Subject: DCKL translation question: argueing arguments
• Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 14:25:36 +0100
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

dispute v. (argue) ghoH.

Is this meant in a negative or in a positive sense?

My translation works lead me to a negative meaning, but then I saw seen a sentence apparently by marc 
okrand saying that Klingons {ghoH} at the qep'a'. I suppose you have not been not fighting over there, 
so this "argueing" is more in the sense of "talking, discussing, argueing a specific topic"

It's not "having arguments", that would be {Sol} right?
HIchuH!

Quvar.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: DCKL translation question: argueing arguments
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: nom ghel, nom jang
    • From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Klingon WOTD: juH (n)
• Next by Date: Re: nom ghel, nom jang
• Prev by thread: Re: nom ghel, nom jang
• Next by thread: Re: DCKL translation question: argueing arguments
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level