tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Feb 08 15:36:31 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: nom ghel, nom jang

David Trimboli ([email protected])

From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: nom ghel, nom jang
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 15:26:12 -0500
References: <SQYFE62B6Q07QMD0YSCHGXUTSRMXW.40264543@quvar>

From: "Lieven L. Litaer (Quvar)" <[email protected]>

> jISovnIS
> qugh mu''e'
> wot DIp ghap
> tlho' Quvar


wot neH 'oH.

Am I the only one who cringes whenever people stick {mu'} in apposition with
the word in question?

SuStel
Stardate 4106.3

Follow-Ups:
- Re: nom ghel, nom jang
  - From: [email protected]
- DCKL translation question: argueing arguments
  - From: Lieven L. Litaer (Quvar) <[email protected]>
- Re: nom ghel, nom jang
  - From: Lieven L. Litaer (Quvar) <[email protected]>

References:
- nom ghel, nom jang
  - From: Lieven L. Litaer (Quvar) <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: other person imperatives
Next by Date: Re: Sung Hol (was: Re: to everyone In defense of tlhIngan Hol)
Prev by thread: Re: nom ghel, nom jang
Next by thread: Re: nom ghel, nom jang
Index(es):

Back to archive top level