tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Apr 08 20:32:20 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: joj usage...

Dar'Qang ([email protected])

• From: Dar'Qang <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: joj usage...
• Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 22:53:01 -0500
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

At 02:26 PM 4/7/2004, Voragh wrote:
>qurgh wrote:
>
>
> >I guess the bigger question in my mind now is: Can a list of nouns 
> linked by a
> >conjunction still act as a the first noun in a noun-noun constuction?
>
>AFAIK, there are no known examples of the case you have in mind.  (Can
>anyone else think of one?)

Setting aside the issue about whether or not prefix-implied pronouns can 
serve as {-bogh} clause head
nouns, the follow fragment from the Warriors' Anthem:

yoHbogh matlhbogh je SuvwI'

Seems to be implicitly using [noun noun {je} noun].



Dar'Qang
bItaghbe'chugh bIrInbe'ba' 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: joj usage...
    • From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • joj usage...
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: joj usage...
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: {HolQeD} vIHev! {HolQeD} vIHev!
• Next by Date: Re: joj usage...
• Previous by thread: Re: joj usage...
• Next by thread: Re: joj usage...
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level