tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Apr 01 03:25:38 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: it; SIS

Alan Anderson ([email protected])

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: it; SIS
• Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 06:25:24 -0500
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <4297ZVIH2U1WKI86DBWV3VJH6154KIJG.4068db61@quvar> <[email protected]> <a05100305bc8fc593b410@[192.168.0.3]> <000601c416d2$d3af97e0$0200a8c0@narya> <a05100308bc9000eea603@[192.168.0.3]> <[email protected]> <a0510030abc90cdb2a7ed@[192.168.0.3]> <[email protected]>

ja' SuStel:
>I do not find DloraH's second-hand account of Okrand's words to be
>completely reliable.  This is not to say that I don't trust DloraH's
>memory -- it's a second-hand account, so the exact wording of the
>information can't be analyzed too closely.  And because the wording IS
>rather roundabout to begin with, I naturally (I thought) wondered whether
>the elided subject of /SIS/ really MUST BE /'eng/.

maj, DaH qayajchoH.  De'Hey DaleghQo'be'.  Davoqchu'be' neH.

pImmo' mungmaj, pImlaH ghochmaj, vaj lI'be' ghoHtaHghachmaj.  pItlh.

-- ghunchu'wI'

• Prev by Date: Re: -Daq with verbs of motion
• Next by Date: Re: -Daq with verbs of motion
• Previous by thread: Re: -Daq with verbs of motion
• Next by thread: Re: it; SIS
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level