tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Aug 21 07:53:24 2003

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Grammar question re:tlheD

David Trimboli ([email protected])

• From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Grammar question re:tlheD
• Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 08:51:07 -0400
• References: <000001c36779$7c07b710$6401a8c0@BotanyBay>

I don't think /tlheD/ has been used in canon.  The two most obvious possible
answers are

1. /tlheD/ may take the location being departed as its object, as in /yuQ
wItlheD/ "We departed the planet."

2. /tlheD/ does not take an object.  Thus, /yuQvo' matlheD/.

Regarding possibility 1, and keeping in mind Okrand's interview in HolQeD
7:4 where he describes verbs of motion, it would be conceivable, I think
likely, that the object could also take the /-vo'/ "from" suffix: /yuQvo'
wItlheD/.

SuStel
Stardate 3637.3

----- Original Message ----- 
From: jIqel
To: tlhIngan-Hol@kli. Org
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 8:16 PM
Subject: Grammar question re:tlheD


Does tlheD take an object?  If so, is it the place being departed (from)?
/juHwIj vItlheD/ I depart (from) my home?

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Grammar question re:tlheD
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Grammar question re:tlheD
    • From: "jIqel" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Klingon WOTD: Haq (n)
• Next by Date: Qatlh HTML
• Prev by thread: Grammar question re:tlheD
• Next by thread: Re: Grammar question re:tlheD
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level