tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Mar 02 16:30:22 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: lu- (was Re: [KLBC] -lu' and -ghach)
ja' QInteS:
>Whatever happened to {tu'lu'} being the exception to adding {lu-}?
It's not an exception. It's just a common mistake. See KGT page 168.
There are several pages devoted to a discussion of the issue. Here is a
relevant quote from page 172:
"Except in formal situations, however, the omission of {lu-} in
such cases is often overlooked. Though technically an error,
and jarring to many Klingon's ears, it causes no confusion as to
the intended meaning of the sentence."
-- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh