tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Mar 02 13:22:07 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: lu- (was Re: [KLBC] -lu' and -ghach)
- From: "TPO" <[email protected]>
- Subject: RE: lu- (was Re: [KLBC] -lu' and -ghach)
- Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2002 13:22:02 -0500
- Importance: Normal
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
> > puqpu' lutu'lu' - there are children / children are found
> Whatever happened to {tu'lu'} being the exception to adding
> {lu-}?
Hmm. Is there really a [tu'lu'] exception? MO doesn't actually say that,
but the examples can suggest such. Maybe I fell into that third trap
Krankor mentioned.
DloraH