tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Mar 02 12:12:18 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: lu- (was Re: [KLBC] -lu' and -ghach)
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: lu- (was Re: [KLBC] -lu' and -ghach)
- Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2002 12:12:01 -0500
- References: <000101c1c0ca$0bf336e0$9d51e8cd@dlorah>
ja' DloraH:
> puqpu' lutu'lu' - there are children / children are found
> Who is the one that finds the children? We don't care. Our attention is on
> the children; we don't care who or what made the observation. Indefinite
> subject.
Whatever happened to {tu'lu'} being the exception to adding {lu-}? Captain
Krankor discussed it in "From the Grammarian's Desk" in HolQeD volume 7, number
3. That was 3 and a half years ago. Has new information come to us regarding
that since then? Rather than re-type his words here I would ask you to refer
to it and get back to me.
QInteS