tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Sep 29 14:23:06 1998
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Ke'Plak
- From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Ke'Plak
- Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1998 17:23:03 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
- Priority: NORMAL
On Mon, 28 Sep 1998 14:32:20 -0700 (PDT) TPO
<[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >...question words as relative pronouns. Unfortunately, Klingon
> >> >doesn't USE question words as relative pronouns because Klingon
> >> >doesn't HAVE any relative pronouns.
> >>
> >> We don't know if klingon has relative pronouns or not.
> >> "questions" can't be used as objects, but we don't know if by coincidence
> >> question words can act as rel pronouns, IF klingon has rel pronouns.
> >>
> >> DloraH
> >
> >We do know that relative pronouns do not exist. If you think
> >otherwise, just point to the section in TKD that describes
> >them. The closest thing you'll get is the relative clause which
> >works through a verb suffix, not a pronoun.
> >
> >charghwI'
>
> Can I point to MO instead? (May 98)
>
> DloraH
My. That's informative. Care to expand on that a little?
charghwI' 'utlh (September 98)