tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue May 26 15:23:32 1998

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: On (was Off) topic: I need a help in translation




ja' charghwI':
> > Hol latlh Dalo'taHvIS, qechvam yIqon.
> 
> loQ mumISmoH <<Hol latlh>>.
> 
Hol wa' Dalo'taHvIS qech DalaD.
Hol cha' Dalo'taHvIS qech Daqon.
<<Hol latlh>> vIlo'DI', Holvam cha' vIDel 'e' vIHech.

> > pagh bIH mu''e'. Hoch bIH qech'e'.
> 
> Plurality is really interesting here. You are showcasing
> Klingon's ability to avoid grammatical redundency. Most

motlh <<-pu'>> <<-mey>> <<-Du'>> je vIlo'be' 'e' vInID.
rut mIwvammo' mu'tlhegh rIn yajHa'lu'.
pIj mu'tlhegh rIn yajlu'chu'.

<<yajHa'lu'>>, <<yajlu'chu'>> je vIghItlhtaHvIS, Hutlhmo' <<-laH>>, 
cha' mu'tlheghvam yajHa'be'lu'. bIQoch'a'? 

on the other hand, I think, this one is a bit too much...
the time stamp is supposed to modify {Hutlh <<-laH>>},
and the whole thing should serve as a causal clause for
the main sentence, where the {-be'} really ought to
negate the {-mo'} on {Hutlh}... :-(

> langauges reinforce a message by exhibiting a lot of redundency
> and failure for things to "agree" is considered grammatical
> error, but in Klingon, you have found the most efficient place

one counterexample is Turkish, where a noun with a number is never
to be explicitly marked as plural, like saying "two dog" instead 
of "two dog_s_" would be correct (and of course all those
languages that say "mu" to this problem by not having any markers
that could be used for "agreement")

> to indicate plurality in the pronoun, omitting the noun
> suffixes, and there's no problem with the grammatical
> "disagreement" with the grammatically singular nouns {pagh} and
> {Hoch}. This is quite elegant. I like it.
> 
choquvqu'moHneS!
jatlh Human bIDwIj... jatlh tlHIngan bIDwI':
tlHIngan jIH }}:-}

                                           Marc Ruehlaender
                                           aka HomDoq
                                           [email protected]



Back to archive top level