tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat May 23 14:45:32 1998
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: lo'laHghach (was: Quj bej Holtej qorDu')
- From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: lo'laHghach (was: Quj bej Holtej qorDu')
- Date: Fri, 22 May 1998 19:22:00 -0400
From: Marc Ruehlaender <[email protected]>
>ja' SuStel:
>> For another, {lo'laHghach} must obviously be {lo'} + {-laH} + {-ghach},
not
>> {lo'laH} + {-ghach}.
>>
>but {lo'} + {laH} + {-ghach} literally means "ability to use";
>how does that mean "value" (TKD p.176)?
Ah, yes, I see what you're getting at. It's a good point.
SuStel
Stardate 98390.1