tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun May 10 11:54:43 1998

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Another short story... KLBC

• From: "Neal Schermerhorn" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Another short story... KLBC
• Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 15:00:25 -0400

ghItlh Qov:

>DanaDHa'lu'ta'. batlh DaHutlhchu'.
>This is a complex one, with -lu' and a changed meaning of the prefix.

I would prefer to write <DanaDHa'lu'ta'. quv DaHutlhchu'> to avoid the
synonymous noun/adjective. <batlh DaHutlhchu'> *could* mean "You lack it
honorably."

BUT - is there a MO distinction between <quv> and <batlh> in their nominal
use? I don't recall one, but if I am wrong, this suggestion might be
incorrect.

Qermaq

• Follow-Ups:
  • A Matter of Honor
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: KLBC: 2nd exercise: tlhIngan maH
• Next by Date: A Matter of Honor
• Prev by thread: Re: Another short story... KLBC
• Next by thread: A Matter of Honor
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level