tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Jul 15 10:42:42 1998

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: KLBCbej: jIyIntaH



---Christiane Scharf  wrote:
>
> ja' Qov:
> 
> > ---HovqIjoywI'  wrote:
> > > muqaw'a' vay'?
> >
> > pIqawba'.  boch HovqIj; Hov wov rur.
> 
> jIboch'a'? chay' 'e' DatlhojlaH? yIqaw'eghmoH: logh qIjDaq Hov qIj

neplaw' ponglIj.  

> mu' SovlIj QaQ law' Hoch nuvpu' mu' Sov QaQ puS net maq. (wej qaqIHmo'
> vItoblaHbe')

taHchugh laHvetlh jIDo'.  

> Well, that's my problem. Is {-taH} + {rIntaH} ungrammatical or just
> unusual /weird?

rIntaH itself is weird.  Whether -taH + rIntaH is ungrammatical is a
matter of semantics.  It's certainly a contradiction.  Either it
continues or it doesn't.  Pick one. 

==
Qov - Beginners' Grammarian 

_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com



Back to archive top level