tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Jan 28 14:50:01 1998

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Locatives and {-bogh}

• From: "Qermaq" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Locatives and {-bogh}
• Date: Wed, 28 Jan 1998 17:51:44 -0500

ghItlh charghwI':

>Trying to take {meQtaHbogh qachDaq} and claim that
>it is evidence that {-Daq} is acting just like {-'e'} is
>spectacularly weak because there is no reason whatsoever to use
>{-'e'} on {qach}.

*be spectacular*'a' QaghwIj? choquvmoH, charghwI' {:o)

Qermaq

• Prev by Date: Re: It's a puzzelment
• Next by Date: RE: mathematics
• Prev by thread: Re: Locatives and {-bogh}
• Next by thread: KLBC:*Spice* be'Hommey che'Ha'qu'
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level