tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jan 27 19:07:05 1998

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC: nuq and 'Iv

• From: Marian Schwartz <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: KLBC: nuq and 'Iv
• Date: Tue, 27 Jan 1998 22:06:40 -0500

ghItlh ~mark
>{'Iv targh} for "whose targh" sounds absolutely fine to me (and how else
to do it?)  It might have been me, for all I know, but until I >see what I
was thinking then I'm puzzled.

Hmm.  Here's one thing that seems certain.  Even if {nuq} and {'Iv} don't
behave like that (maybe they have counterpart type 4 suffixes?) we can
_definitely_ say {nuq DungDaq} for "above what?", as briefly discussed (by
~mark, I think) in HolQeD 6.1, page 10.  Even if the chuvmey {nuq} and
{'Iv} just don't do that, they can certainly behave like the other pronouns
for prepositional concepts.
Qapla'
qoror

• Prev by Date: tlhIngan Hol vIlo'nIS
• Next by Date: Re: It's a puzzelment
• Prev by thread: Re: KLBC: nuq and 'Iv
• Next by thread: Re: qIp/ngeQ (was "Titanic" chov SuSvaj)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level