tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Jan 03 02:12:47 1998

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: KLBC -- jIlIHegh (extreme beginner)



At 22:59 98-01-02 -0800, charghwI' wrote:
}Okay, you corrected my corrections, and I'd like to point out 
}this:

I think my followups tended more to "yeah, what he said" than corrections.

}On Fri, 2 Jan 1998 12:22:33 -0800 (PST) Qov <[email protected]> 
}wrote:
}
}> At 12:45 98-01-01 -0800, notjISaH wrote:
}> }In a message dated 97-12-26 23:33:58 EST, you write:
}> }...
}> }Qu'vatlh!!!  jabbI'IDghom lIHbogh *FAQ*Hom'e' vIlaDpu'.  *website* *FAQ*
}> }vIlaDpu'be'.  jeH jiHlaw'.  poHvatlhDaq *website*Daq *FAQ* vInejpu'be'.
}> }chotu'moHDI' vIlaD.  
}> 
}> Always {jIH}. A vowel wrong in {poHvetlh}, "that time."  
}
}So, you think {jeH jIHlaw'} is a sentence? Qov! How COULD you? 
}You corrected the case of the "i" and didn't see anything else 
}wrong with this? A cacaphony of people individually leapt upon 
}my {loDnI'lIj} and now you do this and nobody else says a word.
}
}[sigh]

DopDaq qul yIchenmoH QobDI' ghu'.  I guess I believed him that {jeH} was a
noun as well as a verb.  {jIjeHlaw' jIH}.  It isn't.

}Maybe if I were prettier...

chaq nIteb QInmeywIj DalaD SoH neH
 
}> }--The construction {poHvatlhDaq} does not seem very probable from what I
have
}> }read.  Can the locative suffix be used to mean "at" a time?  Or would it
maybe
}> }have to be some complex "During the time before ____some specific
}> }occurence___"?
}> 
}> Klingons don't habitually use the metaphor of place to refer to times, so
}> omit {-Daq}.  You just need {poHvetlh} for "at that time."
}
}I hate for us to be giving such a promising new student such 
}conflicting advice, so I'll try to back up my suggestion with 
}the one bit of canon I have on the topic of the use of {-vam} on 
}time stamps. Note that he never mentions {-vetlh} at all and 
}from the sound of it, I doubt {-vetlh} works with time.

(Okrand on timestamps delted)
 
}Perhaps no one else gets the sense that {-vetlh} doesn't fit 
}time from this explanation, but I do believe that at least one 
}should consider it to be noteably absent from canon. Better 
}would be to find some event or action relating to "that time" 
}and use the suffix {-DI'} to point to it, rather than the vague, 
}wittering and indecisive[1] "at that time", which if anything is 
}simply redundant, since any time stamp already in context to be 
}pointed to as "at that time" is still the time context without 
}"at that time", right?
}
}Whatever the case, I think it bad advice to just shrug it off 
}and say, "{poHvetlh}? Sure. Looks fine to me."

bIlugh.  jIQochbe'  That's what I did. 

}Qov, you are doing a fine job. I guess I'm just feeling a little 
}over-protective of our amazing new student who happened to show 
}up while you were off enjoying the holidays.

DaHjaj chobuQbe'.  jIDachtaHvIS bIvumchu'mo' jabbI'IDmey vIlaDchu'.  qajIHbe'.

}> }Supvam vIlo'pu'chugh qay' jIH Quch law' jIH Quch puS.
}> Hmm.  This gets weird.  
}
}> Would you be satisfied that {Supvam vIlo'pu'chugh muQuchmoHpu' De'}
}> represents your thought? 
}
}I like this. Or, we could use a ghunchu'vian negative and say:

Grin.  For the benefit of those just joining the program, I'll mention that
this trick is one often recommended by ghunchu'wI' (Alan Anderson).  I was
actually expecting HIM to follow up.

}Supvam vIlo'be'pu'mo' Qatlhpu' Qu'wIj.

}> }OK, I admit that it all falls apart on that last phrase.  Can I put suffixes
}> }on verbs in that comparative formula?  
}> 
}> I'm comfortable with suffixes on the verbs, but not on the {law'} and {puS}
}> themselves.
}
}This could prove to be an interesting discussion. So, which 
}suffixes make you feel comfortable on the verbs of quality? All 
}of them? Care to show examples of good use of suffixes on verbs 
}of quality in comparatives?

Heh.  All the ones I'd use on any other verb expressing a quality or
condition: {-qu'}, {-Ha'} and {-be'}.  Nothing else makes a lot of sense.
Good catch.  I mentally tested only the first one that came to mind, {-qu'}.  
 
}> }vay'mey mughojmoHbejpu'.
}> }
}> }(Heehee!! I just couldn't resist!  That is supposed to read "You have
}> }definitely taught me some stuff (somethings)."  Interesting stuff, I might

}Well, {'op Dochmey} perhaps. Anyway, {vay'mey} didn't bother me 
}as much as {mu-} used as the prefix for "You taught me".

Oops.  Gotta learn to read the English.

}Yeah, before the less extreme beginners give you new meaning for 
}the term "extreme", as in "new angles that your major joints can 
}acquire, particularly, the neck, once wrung."

Mind you, a scale has two extremes.  

Qov     [email protected]
Beginners' Grammarian                 



Back to archive top level