tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Feb 08 06:14:12 1998
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: RE: KLBC: logh veQ
- From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: RE: KLBC: logh veQ
- Date: Sun, 8 Feb 1998 09:14:33 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
- Priority: NORMAL
On Fri, 6 Feb 1998 15:00:23 -0800 (PST) "Andeen, Eric"
<[email protected]> wrote:
> veHna' Hutlh muD. yuQvo' ghoSlu'taHvIS, QIt lojchoH muD. <yuQ muD 'el
> ..> wIjatlhtaH, 'ej muD veH wIqel: veHvam wa' DopDaq muD tu'lu', 'ej
> latlh DopDaq muD tu'be'lu'. 'ach veHvam wItu'chu'be': SaH muD chay' net
> juv? veH Daq SIghchu' juvmeH mIw. noch 'Itlhqu' lo'lu'taHvIS, muD qubqu'
> juvlaH, vaj Hopqu' veH net 'ang. noch 'Itlhbe' lo'lu'taHvIS, Sum veH net
> 'ang.
>
> {muD qub} vIchup.
'ach ghu' Sar 'oSlaH <muD qub>. le'chugh muD Dotlh, qub muDvam.
pe'vIl jevlu'chugh qaStaHvIS poH ngaj, qub muDvam. He'DI' Soj
'ey, qub muD. muD qub 'oH bang tlhuHna' Qav'e'.
tInlaH veH. jeD ghorDaq Sumbogh muD'e'. jeDHa'choH ghorvo'
HopchoHbogh muD'e'. Hopchu'DI' ghor, muD tu'be'lu'.
jeDHa'chu'DI' muD, logh muD je wav veH.
> SKI: pagh longwindedly explains why {muD veH} is not a particularly good
> term.
>
> pagh
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: William H. Martin [SMTP:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Friday, February 06, 1998 2:02 PM
> > To: Multiple recipients of list
> > Subject: Re: KLBC: logh veQ
> >
> > According to Alan Anderson:
> > > According to Edy:
> > > > There are few air molecules which cause friction and cause
> > > >the deceleration of the satellites. I didn't have a name for
> > > >molecule :-((
> > >
> > > Collectively, air molecules make up something called "atmosphere".
> > > Individual molecules don't have a significant effect on the velocity
> >
> > > of a satellite; it's the rarefied air as a whole that slows it down.
> >
> > > If you don't like calling a near-vacuum {muD}, how about {muDHom}?
> >
> > How about {muD veH} or {muD HeH}?
> >
> > > -- ghunchu'wI' (Edy's mentor)
> >
> > charghwI'
charghwI'