tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Dec 08 13:51:54 1998
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: nuQbogh jaj
ja' charghwI':
> On Fri, 4 Dec 1998 15:26:36 -0800 (PST) Christiane Scharf
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > mujang charghwI':
> >
> > > HovqIj,
> > >
> > > bIQuplaw'...
> > > ngaj Qu'vam.
> >
> > bIlugh. motlh qay'be' Qu'vam...
> > Hevetlhvo' Do' DaH jImejlaH. jIleSlaH. jIjotchoHlaH. wej Dun ghu'wIj 'ach
> > Hu' puS qab law' DaH qab puS.
>
> maj.
>
> > > ... DaHjaj Hum ravwIj 'ej He'So'
> > > pa'wIj. wejpuH.
> >
> > wejpuH, bIqar. 'ach reH QeHlIj Dapolchugh ghaytan bI'Itqu'choH. ghaytan wa'
> > jaj bIjor 'ej bIQID'eghchu' qoj latlhpu' DaQIDchu'. rut QeHlIj DatlhabmoH 'e'
> > qaq law' QeHlIj DavI' 'e' qaq puS.
>
> mu'meylIj vIyajbe', 'ach qechlIj vIyaj. bIvbej mu'meylIj.
> qechlIj vIqelDI' jIQochbe'. 'ach mIwwIj vIDub vIneHbej.
>
You probably dislike that I used a sentence with <'e'> as the subject of
the <law' / puS> construction, right? I wouldn't have dared to do this,
but I'm _quite_ sure we have canon for this (one of the skybox cards, I
think). If I am wrong here, I am going to accept it.
> > > vaj qaqeSrup. reH yItuv! reH yIjot!
> >
> > reH vulqangan yIDa???
>
> HItIchQo'!
qatIch 'e' vIHechbe'bej 'ach mu' <reH> Dalo'chugh jIQoch.
>
>
> > > bIQeHchoHDI' tugh bIpay.
> >
> > ghu' law'vaD lughbej qeSvam 'ach rut QeHnISchoHlu' 'e' vIHar.
>
> rut QeHnISlu' 'ach roD Seng QeH.
ghaytan.
HovqIj
>
>
> > HovqIj
>
> charghwI' 'utlh