tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Aug 10 22:08:14 1998
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: qoSwIj wa'maH HutDIch
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: KLBC: qoSwIj wa'maH HutDIch
- Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1998 01:07:37 EDT
In a message dated 98-07-25 14:39:26 EDT, Matthew Pepperel writes:
<< wa'Hu qaS qoSwIj wa'maH HutDIch. DaHram 'oH wIlop. muiSuch juppu'wI' 'e'
vItlhobta'. DIvutta' 'e' nay'mey DISop. Do' wa'leS jI'uHbe' >>
qoSlIj yItIv
qoSlIj yItIv
qoSlIj yItIv Matthewoy
qoSlIj yItIv
instead of {DaHram 'oH wIlop} I suggest {DaHjaj ram wIlop}. I do not find
{'oH} as "it" to be necessary at all. I definitely prefer {DaHjaj ram} over
{DaHram}.
in {muSuch juppu'wI' 'e' vItlhobta'} we find a type seven suffix on the verb
of the {'e'} clause; this is not allowed. Merely drop the {-ta'}.
For {DIvutta' 'e' nay'mey DISop} I can only guess you mean {nay'mey
DIvutta'bogh DISop}.
And, for {Do' wa'leS jI'uHbe'} I'd try {jIDo'chugh wa'leS jI'uHbe'}.
Just trying to help. peHruS