tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Apr 24 12:01:21 1998
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: qep'a' vaghDIch
- From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: qep'a' vaghDIch
- Date: Fri, 24 Apr 1998 15:01:00 -0400 (EDT)
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> from "Holtej" at Apr 24, 98 10:17:45 am
According to Holtej:
>
> wa'Hu' maja'chuq *Lawrence jIH je. qep'a' vaghDIch wIqel. [1] DISvam jISaH
> 'e' vIwuqta'!
maj.
> wa' ben, cha' ben je loQ belHa' jatlhwI'pu' nIv. wanI'mey law' nab
> *Lawrence, 'ach jatlhwI' chu'vaD nablaw'. loQ jIbep je 'e' vIchID.
qaStaHvIS qep'a' loSDIch pIj ma''egh jeSwI'pu'. QujtaHvIS
latlhpu', Quj-pa' HurDaq ghom jatlhwI'pu'. lutmey DIjatlhtaH 'ej
maqIDtaH. veSDaq majatlh. tachDaq majatlh. Quj wIpoQbe'. DaqDaq
maghom 'ej majatlh. qay'be'.
jatlhchu'wI' ma'laHchugh Quj vaj Qujvam tIvba' jatlhchu'wI'.
Quj 'oghmeH jIQubtaH 'ach jIpo'be'. chaq pagh qech QaQ vIjon.
Quj vIjonbe'chugh lutmey vI'IjtaH 'e' vItIvbej. jIqIDtaH.
Qujmey vItIvbe'chugh jISaHbe'. qep'a' vaghDIch vItIvtaH.
> jatlhwI' nIv, jatlhwI' chu' wIma'meH Qujmey chu' wI'oghnIS. chaq rut cha'
> ghom wIchenmoHlaH, 'ach motlh wa' ghom qaq law' ghommey law' qaq puS 'e'
> vIHar.
rut maghomchu'. rut maghomHa'. ram. not maghomchu'chugh vaj
Do'Ha'.
> vaj SaqaD, 'ej jIqaD'egh je: qep'a' yIbuS. nuq Data' DaneH?
jatlhlaHbogh juppu'wI' vIghom. maqID. lutmey DIjatlh.
maQorghchuq. maSaHchuq. Qujmey? Qujmey vItIv je 'ach lutmey
potlh law' Qujmey potlh puS 'e' vIHar.
If we come up with more creative ways for groups to build
stories, that might be enjoyable...
> Qujmey chu'
> Da'oghlaH'a'? jatlhwI' chu' wItungHa'meH 'ej jatlhwI' nIv wIma'meH DaH
> wInabnIS. pagh wItungnIS. quqnIS'a' cha' Quj? Quj pIm wInabnIS'a'?
> qechmeyraj yIngeH!
qama'ta''a'?
> --Holtej
>
> [1] Geez, I never considered this use of /qel/ to be controversial before.
> Perhaps it's my native English speaker bias; OTOH, /qel/ and /buS/ seem like
> totally different concepts to me, distinguishing more than simply a
> transitive/intransitive distinction. What I *really* want is a transitive
> way to convey */vay' wIja'chuq/!
I don't consider it to be controversial now. Are you confusing
{qel} and {qIm}?
charghwI'