tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Apr 22 22:09:36 1998
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: vIghro'mey
- From: WestphalWz <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: vIghro'mey
- Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1998 01:09:20 EDT
In a message dated 98-04-22 07:24:59 EDT, charghwI' writes:
<< >>> vIghro'mey yIbuQQo' tojmo' De'wI'lIjDaq porghbIQ lulIng
>>> [Bruce Graham]
>>
>> <tojmo'> vIyajchu'be'. <tojmeH> DaHech'a'?
> ghobe' {tojmo'} vIHechbej.
Is the deception the cause of the action or the purpose of it?
It doesn't make sense to me as the cause. It does make sense to
me as the purpose. If anything, the action seems to be the cause
of the deception. In order to trick you; for the purpose of
tricking you, this action takes place. Because he tricks you the
action takes place? It just doesn't sound right. Because he does
the action, he tricks you. That sounds strange, but closer to
being accurate.
>>> SanIDmey ben joHHompu' chaH vIghro'pu''e' 'e' vanlu'
>>
>> jImIS. roD <'e' vanlu'> tamnIS <net van>, 'ach naDev <net van>
>> vIyajbe'.
>>
>> vaghSanIDben joHHompu' chaHlaw'mo' vIghro'pu''e' luvanlu'.
> jIQochbe' qaq {net van}; qaqb'e {'e' vanlu'}.
Do they salute that the cats are minor lords, or do they salute
the cats which are minor lords? >>
-------peHruS continues--------
> ghobe' {tojmo'} vIHechbej.
Is the deception the cause of the action or the purpose of it?
"Because the cat(s) deceive.........
{joHHom} = demigods
peHruS