tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Oct 15 14:49:53 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
SkyBox
I don't know if anyone has discussed these particulars . . .
S25
{ngoch luchermeH 'ej wo' San luwuqmeH . . .}
Isn't there supposed to be a {-moH} on {cher}?
{yejquv DevwI' moj ghawran 'e' wuqta' cho' 'oDwI' . . . }
Oops. There is a {-ta'} on the second verb of an {'e'} construction . . .
(Well, if Okrand really did write these, then I don't feel so bad now about
all the times I have done that.)
S26
{DuraS tuq tlhIngan yejquv patlh luDub 'e' reH lunIDtaH DuraS be'nI'pu' . . .
}
I know we've already mentioned the fact that {reH] comes *after* the {'e'},
but there are a couple of other things. We now know that {Dub} can be used
transitively (either that or the author forgot to use {-moH} again). And
there's another one of those aspect suffixes on the second verb . . . !
SuStel
Stardate 96790.9