tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Jun 05 16:25:39 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: suffix-o-mania
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: suffix-o-mania
- Date: Wed, 5 Jun 1996 19:25:05 -0400
In a message dated 96-06-05 16:19:21 EDT, wovwI' wrote:
>I thought I understood, but the next posting I looked at contained the
>sentence: <Saghbe'taH QujwI'pu'mo' vIng SuStel.> I would have put the
>-mo' on the verb instead. Please explain more about -mo'.
Qaghlaw' ghunchu'wI'. <Saghbe'taHmo' QujwI'pu'> jatlhnIS. 'ej jIvIngbe'pu'!
jIbeppu' neH. {{:-)
SuStel
Hovjaj 96429.7