tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Jun 01 22:46:30 1996

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: KLBC



In a message dated 96-06-01 01:41:51 EDT, ghunchu'wI' wrote:

>Not that I have a leg to stand on, but I'm distressed by the number of
>"names" that end with {-wI'}.  Names don't have to be nouns; they don't
>even have to be translatable.  (Though it is handy if they are able to
>be *pronounced*.)

I've been wondering of late if our chosen names would seem to Klingons like
North American Indian names' translations sound to me.  Klingon names are
things like {Qugh}, {qolotlh}, and {qeylIS}, but we choose things like
{ghunchu'wI'}, {SuStel}, and even {HolHaDwI' 'ong}!  It reminds me of names
like "Sitting Bull," "Running Bear," or even "Squatting Dog."

I like some of the transliterations which people have come up with.  {nuqHm}
was a good one, I thought.  {r'Hul} seems very Klingon to me.  Even a
less-than-true transliteration, {Seqram}, sounds good.

Despite this, I still think the award for the best chosen name so far goes to
{qu'}.  Not only does he (a) pick a one-syllable name which seems very
Klingon, and (b) get to describe himself as fierce, but he also (c) gets to
have a name which is essentially an exclamation point!  The double entendre
(check my spelling here) is classic!

SuStel
Hovjaj 96419.4


Back to archive top level