tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Dec 16 08:00:26 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
parmaq (par'mach) - oh, it *IS* canon, eh?
- From: "Joel Anderson" <[email protected]>
- Subject: parmaq (par'mach) - oh, it *IS* canon, eh?
- Date: 16 Dec 1996 16:00:17 -0000
Qapla'!
While charghwI' may *always* be right, it is nice to
know that I, too can occasionally be correct.
Or, as I said back on 10/21:
Par'Mach is a Canonical word. Period.
joel anderson * [email protected] * [email protected]
mIghghachvo' yImej 'ej yIQaQ; roj yInej 'ej Dochvam yItlha'
----------------------------------------------------------
http://members.aol.com/JPKlingon [email protected]
GALACTIC LANGUAGES: [email protected]
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/4854
---------------------------------------------------------
Get Your *Web-Based* Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
---------------------------------------------------------