tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Dec 16 13:05:13 1996

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: parmaq (par'mach) - oh, it *IS* canon, eh?

• From: "Dark Viper (mayq)" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: parmaq (par'mach) - oh, it *IS* canon, eh?
• Date: Mon, 16 Dec 1996 16:06:29 -0500

At 08:07 AM 12/16/96 -0800, Joel Anderson wrote:
>Or, as I said back on 10/21:
>
> Par'Mach is a Canonical word. Period.

No it's not, but <parmaq> is. They're obviously different.

-mayq

• Prev by Date: Spain+}}};-]
• Next by Date: Re: Dr Okrand Speaks -- ben
• Prev by thread: parmaq (par'mach) - oh, it *IS* canon, eh?
• Next by thread: parmaq (par'mach) - oh, it *IS* canon, eh?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level