tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Feb 07 07:53:29 1995
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: bIQaghbejlI' *yoDtargh*
- From: [email protected] (Steve Weaver)
- Subject: Re: bIQaghbejlI' *yoDtargh*
- Date: Tue, 7 Feb 1995 10:54:55 -0500
charghwI' says ("love my good-n-plenty...." sorry, I'm in one of THOSE
moods again. ;-) ):
>According to Steve Weaver:
>>
>> *yoDtargh* said:
>> > vaHvo' nISwI'HIch lel *yoDtargh* 'ej Steve nach lurghDaq nuH Qeq.
>> > DaH HolQeDvaD Spoonerism yIchenmoH ra' *yoDtargh*.
>>
>>
>> qayajchu'
>> bIQaghbejlI' *yoDtargh*
>> DoS chImlaw' boQeq
>
>yoDtargh has become plural?
>
>> HolQeDvaD *spoonerism* vIbuSqu'taH
>> vInIDbej
>
But I thought that the "bIQaghbejlI' *yoDtargh*" {*yoDtargh*, You are
certainly in the progress of making a mistake. You are aiming at an empty
target.} was singular. How is this plural ? I thought {bI-} was "You (no
object)" ?
qayajchu'
bIQaghbejlI' *yoDtargh* <-
DoS chImlaw' boQeq <-
HolQeDvaD *spoonerism* vIbuSqu'taH
vInIDbej
And I thought I had finally constructed a perfeckt Klingon response too ...
*sniff* *sniff* :.-(
Oh, well back to the drawing board. Will someone correct my grammer please?
(or my gramper). Thanks
vIta'pu'be' !!! <- tlhIngan ghaH *Bart Simpson*'e'
Steve Weaver [email protected]