tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Apr 30 16:59:59 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: latlh

• From: Jeremy Cowan <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: latlh
• Date: Sun, 30 Apr 1995 18:58:37 -0500 (CDT)
• In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.89.9504301102.A18636-0100000@netcom7>

On Sun, 30 Apr 1995, yoDtargh wrote:
> ghay'cha'!  I was thinking {pagh} was a number, I forgot that there 
> was a noun entry too.

> Sat, 29 Apr 1995 ghItlh janSIy:
> > I don't see how this relates to my post.  Or does it?

> SoHvaD jItlhIj.  jIQaghba'.  QaghwIj Dogh yIqImQo'.
> reH Suvrup SuvwI''a'.

maH Hoch nuHIvlaH veqlargh

janSIy

• References:
  • Re: latlh
    • From: "R.B Franklin" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: pagh (was latlh)
• Next by Date: Re: pagh (was latlh)
• Prev by thread: Re: latlh
• Next by thread: Re: latlh
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level