tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Apr 30 11:25:29 1995
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: latlh
On Sun, 30 Apr 1995, William H. Martin wrote:
> According to R.B Franklin:
> >
> > {Hoch} is a noun. {pagh} is a number. Their use is somewhat different.
>
> While everything else said here is accurate, {pagh} has TWO
> listings in TKD. One is a number and the other is a noun. If it
> is being used to mean "nothing, none" (might he have meant
> "no one/nobody"?), then it is to be used as a noun without
> reference to its useage as a nunber.
ghay'cha'! I was thinking {pagh} was a number, I forgot that there
was a noun entry too.
---
Sat, 29 Apr 1995 ghItlh janSIy:
> I don't see how this relates to my post. Or does it?
SoHvaD jItlhIj. jIQaghba'. QaghwIj Dogh yIqImQo'.
reH Suvrup SuvwI''a'.
> > yoDtargh
>
> charghwI'
yoDtargh