tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Apr 13 06:44:57 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: muHIvqa' veqlargh

• From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: muHIvqa' veqlargh
• Date: Thu, 13 Apr 95 9:44:53 EDT
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>; from "Alan Anderson" at Apr 13, 95 9:11 am

According to Alan Anderson:
> 
> charghwI':> [North America]Daq wa'maH Daq tu'lu'.
>           > [Europe]Daq cha' Daq tu'lu'.
> 
> Ah, a way to say it without using "to be" at all!  I'll try to remember
> this pattern.

TKD 4.2.5 
 
> -- ghunchu'wI'

charghwI'
-- 

 \___
 o_/ \
 <\__,\
  ">   | Get a grip.
   `   |

• References:
  • Re: muHIvqa' veqlargh
    • From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: {rIn} versus {Qav}
• Next by Date: Re: jIghtaHvIS jIghItlh
• Prev by thread: Re: muHIvqa' veqlargh
• Next by thread: Re: -vaD vs. -Daq on pronouns
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level