tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Apr 11 15:21:59 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: muHIvqa' veqlargh




On Tue, 11 Apr 1995, William H. Martin wrote:

> According to R.B Franklin:
> ..
> > > *North America*Daq bIH wa'maH Daq.
> > > *Europe*Daq biH cha' Daq.
> > 
> > In constructions of this type, if the subject is a noun, it needs the 
> > {-'e'} suffix.  'ay' jav DoD wej yIlaD.
> > [North America]Daq bIH wa'maH Daq'e'.
> > [Europe]Daq bIH cha' Daq'e'.
> 
> Not quite. The first noun is a locative, not an object.
> Actually, the use of pronouns as "to be" here is possibly
> misguided.  I would have said:

Whether or not the first noun is a locative or an object, if sentence is 
using a third-person pronoun as a verb, and the subject is a noun, 
the subject needs the topic suffix {-'e'}.  (TKD, Section 6.3)

pa'DajDaq ghaHtaH la''e'.  The commander is in his quarters.
qoH ghaH la''e'.  The commander is a fool.
[North America]Daq bIH wa'maH Daq'e'.  Ten sites are in North America.

> [North America]Daq wa'maH Daq tu'lu'.
> [Europe]Daq cha' Daq tu'lu'.

This is equally valid.

> > > -- ghunchu'wI' Doy'
> > 
> > yoDtargh
> 
> charghwI'

yoDtargh



Back to archive top level