tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Jun 15 09:14:16 1994
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: my mail
- From: [email protected] (Nick NICHOLAS)
- Subject: Re: my mail
- Date: Thu, 16 Jun 1994 10:28:55 +1000 (EST)
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> from "Lisa Stapp" at Jun 15, 94 02:09:00 pm
Hu'tegh! nuq ja' Lisa Stapp jay'?
=Tl> wav'eghpu' Loglan, 'e' muqawmoH wanI'vam.
=vIyajbe' (seriously, I only spend 5-ish minutes daily
= on this... am a BEGINNER!!!)
Translating back to front, as Klingon should be ;) :
This_event makes_me_remember (reminds me) this: Loglan divided_itself.
This business reminds me of when Loglan split.
In fact, me and Mark are now involved with the version that split off from
the original; basically, it was triggered because the language creator
started talking about his copyright. But it's a complicated business, and
I believe some Loglanists are also subscribed here, so I won't bore you
any further with this.
=Tl> pIj maghoHpu' jIH, tlhIngan tej latlh je. pIj jIqu'qu' je,
=Tl> jIghoHtaHvIS. 'a not HolmajvaD Seghvam QIH vIqaSmoH jIghoHDI', 'e'
=Tl> vItulbej.
I and other Klingon scientists have often argued. Often I have also been
really fierce while I am arguing. But I certainly hope that when I argue
I never make_happen (cause) damage of this kind to our language.
(To which charghwI''s response was, of course, spot on.)
Nick.