tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Jul 07 09:27:13 2013

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: [Tlhingan-hol] {-Ha'} with {-Qo'}

Fiat Knox ([email protected])

From: Fiat Knox <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] {-Ha'} with {-Qo'}
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2013 17:26:55 +0100 (BST)
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1373214415; bh=Y6goF2Ppw1Tumcy16Dgg17gag4d1CgVUfJrWf6Hd4ho=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=A6N0R8294JQNYYIO5/6Z1nr6sK45etC9z47rpnHdtL9R/LQpsPCTNDs7+UNYKln9aU6+cFbOZ4YAix/Bv8YdjQdJL74ou1njdQsA3fG9X1lbCJjtRJ9Y/6jyosColr4G6sKTySqFsoqBHlUuxpL4D9OVFJqA6vzEvHz+/OOxLyU=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=1AJbTT5lKyTONFUS+eVDn9ajXfzBfOO88URLnDcJGkyFUC6mtmvOnz6R6MQaoZmtFH4DL/lRhn+aX0TuIY8iwqIymhyJpwAhu/3Au6q5XMfXNTd59HixwY/njlBZJk2UACAAxjnxzEs9/Zb24Aj6EFqh7hF7ZmN5HviRe4DRz90= ;
In-reply-to: <CA+7zAmNuf6ZZiFFZ+HPxHshLdo=QsT8sm8vBXbfLOOtqDGWaJg@mail.gmail.com>
List-archive: <http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol/>
List-id: <tlhingan-hol.stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
List-subscribe: <http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
References: <CA+7zAmM6J9Gdsr0ifaADZApR7MtRNaP6AGbTsDREeXe3ip1iYg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CA+7zAmN2+kUxCfamTGMT7AnprtuBCoPLM1Z1vPB4-ZPn3XFLnA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+7zAmNuf6ZZiFFZ+HPxHshLdo=QsT8sm8vBXbfLOOtqDGWaJg@mail.gmail.com>

<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:garamond, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><span style="font-style: italic;">&gt; No, that's not right either. I suppose {vIHoHQo'be'} and {vIHoHbe'Qo'} both make sense. I don't know why I thought otherwise.</span><br><br>In imperatives, <span style="font-weight: bold;">-be'</span> cannot be used: you use <span style="font-weight: bold;">-Qo'</span> for "<span style="font-style: italic;">don't</span>!" instead. But <span style="font-weight: bold;">-Qo'</span> in a non-imperative carries the meaning of <span style="font-style: italic;">refusal</span>, so {<span style="font-weight: bold;">vIHoHQo'be'</span>} should carry the meaning <span>/</span><span style="font-style: italic;">I DO NOT refuse to kill him</span>/ and {<span style="font-weight: bold;">vIHoHbe'Qo'</span>} should carry the meaning /<span style="font-weight: bold;">I refuse to NOT kill him</span>/, if my TKD is
 correct.<br><br><br><div><blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; margin-top: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"><div style="font-family: garamond, new york, times, serif; font-size: 12pt;"><div style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 12pt;"> </div> </div> </blockquote>  </div></div></body></html>

_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
[email protected]
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol

References:
- [Tlhingan-hol] {-Ha'} with {-Qo'}
  - From: "De'vID" <[email protected]>
- Re: [Tlhingan-hol] {-Ha'} with {-Qo'}
  - From: Rohan Fenwick <[email protected]>
- Re: [Tlhingan-hol] {-Ha'} with {-Qo'}
  - From: Fiat Knox <[email protected]>
- Re: [Tlhingan-hol] {-Ha'} with {-Qo'}
  - From: Rohan Fenwick <[email protected]>
- Re: [Tlhingan-hol] {-Ha'} with {-Qo'}
  - From: "De'vID" <[email protected]>
- Re: [Tlhingan-hol] {-Ha'} with {-Qo'}
  - From: "De'vID" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] {-Ha'} with {-Qo'}
Next by Date: [Tlhingan-hol] Klingon brands
Previous by thread: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] {-Ha'} with {-Qo'}
Next by thread: [Tlhingan-hol] Klingon Word of the Day: patat 'oQqar
Index(es):