tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Jul 07 09:18:18 2013

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: [Tlhingan-hol] {-Ha'} with {-Qo'}

De'vID ([email protected])

From: "De'vID" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] {-Ha'} with {-Qo'}
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2013 18:18:05 +0200
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=pC8pKsIIgg6/FBTUJ7NazkfZ3c9XdqLw2gTautCPbac=; b=ljXigVwLBzW++fY0sDfX6HWvUQ9l4DI79vVzccRlOHX2mlCrNLkmQHa+1KujLSGREw 16NucMc0dZRhY4gq1lhJIPbL7PlUnHZtgACXaBfa5TtTnfoj0BEc83g58VTp00/ZaFNX CCuP+U+7OrGntceSDfdTeDQjtSAjqS5rryfF/rRhRGGaAS+feojQCQ7qx06jxM0x4tyW ji3H74/LquikOpWKQUnoUldqfb43J3tzNdYMTFsjNLzzDhw/16p2PiBWEDrr1eN4m21C aTJmFkT/3PXWRBqYOp+t2yAlPsjx1SHHp5P+RgMedMwyIV3nnhQNj7PvF6At4KqB7gaI ymzA==
In-reply-to: <CA+7zAmN2+kUxCfamTGMT7AnprtuBCoPLM1Z1vPB4-ZPn3XFLnA@mail.gmail.com>
List-archive: <http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol/>
List-id: <tlhingan-hol.stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
List-subscribe: <http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
References: <CA+7zAmM6J9Gdsr0ifaADZApR7MtRNaP6AGbTsDREeXe3ip1iYg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CA+7zAmN2+kUxCfamTGMT7AnprtuBCoPLM1Z1vPB4-ZPn3XFLnA@mail.gmail.com>

<p dir="ltr"><br></p>
<p dir="ltr">On 7 Jul 2013 18:15, &quot;De&#39;vID&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:[email protected]";>[email protected]</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; QeS &#39;utlh:<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; &gt; Ahhh, now I see what De&#39;vID&#39;s confusion was (about the TKD general prohibition on multiple affixes of the same class, I guess).<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; I knew that one can have {-qu&#39;} with one of the negation suffixes. But for some reason I had it in my mind that multiple negative suffixes were disallowed. I guess that applies only to {-be&#39;} and {-Qo&#39;}.</p>

<p dir="ltr">No, that&#39;s not right either. I suppose {vIHoHQo&#39;be&#39;} and {vIHoHbe&#39;Qo&#39;} both make sense. I don&#39;t know why I thought otherwise.</p>
<p dir="ltr">-- <br>
De&#39;vID<br>
</p>

_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
[email protected]
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Tlhingan-hol] {-Ha'} with {-Qo'}
  - From: Fiat Knox <[email protected]>

References:
- [Tlhingan-hol] {-Ha'} with {-Qo'}
  - From: "De'vID" <[email protected]>
- Re: [Tlhingan-hol] {-Ha'} with {-Qo'}
  - From: Rohan Fenwick <[email protected]>
- Re: [Tlhingan-hol] {-Ha'} with {-Qo'}
  - From: Fiat Knox <[email protected]>
- Re: [Tlhingan-hol] {-Ha'} with {-Qo'}
  - From: Rohan Fenwick <[email protected]>
- Re: [Tlhingan-hol] {-Ha'} with {-Qo'}
  - From: "De'vID" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] {-Ha'} with {-Qo'}
Next by Date: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] {-Ha'} with {-Qo'}
Previous by thread: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] {-Ha'} with {-Qo'}
Next by thread: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] {-Ha'} with {-Qo'}
Index(es):