tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Jan 26 19:05:57 2013

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: [Tlhingan-hol] 'arDIch

Robyn Stewart ([email protected]) [KLI Member] [Hol po'wI']

Unlike many languages, English doesn't have a governing body that declares words or structures official or not, so there is no particular thing "alright" has to do to make it to the big time. It is generally considered a misspelling of "all right" so I suppose if it were to develop a distinct meaning in the manner of "all ready" versus "already" it would soon be considered standard English.
And maybe one day nISwI' bej will denote a particular kind of nISwI' not adequately covered by nISwI' beH, perhaps puS'eghlaH nIHwI' bej. 

- Qov

At 18:40 '?????' 1/26/2013, you wrote:
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64'Alright' has documented written use for 400 years and appears in many dictionaries. What does a word have to do to become official? 

-----Original Message-----

From: Robyn Stewart
Sent: 26 Jan 2013 22:54:55 GMT
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] 'arDIch

The issue is that "alright" is not considered a real word in standard English.
At 02:14 '??ÏÉÈKÌ??Ì?LË[ÝHÜ?ÝN??à>> «'arDIch» seems like an alright construction to me. 
> ??\ÈÙ[?[?ÙH[]\Ù\ÈYHÜ?X]K???à ?ø meq vIyajbe'. HIchuH!
?]Z?[ÉÈ]?IÈÛ?^IÙYÚ]IÝYÚ????>qar'a'? mumee ngoDvam! chay' jIQaghpu'?
??××××××××××××À___________________________
>From: Robyn Stewart [[email protected]]
>Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 23:58
Î? tlhIngan-Hol
ÝX??XÝ??N?Õ[?Ø[?ZÛH Ø\?XÚ???öâ2013-01-25, at 13:10, Felix Malmenbeck <[email protected]Ü?ote: 
?????]ÛÝ[[ÝHØ^H Ø\?XÚ?R÷"¤??v$D­6??
???&÷F?öbF?÷6Rv÷VÆBv?fRÖRW6Râ2×RvÖW?£âru', I suppose either could work, but I'd 
> probably just pay for the extra syllable and
\ÚÈÛ]Z?^]IÈ     Ø\?ßK?
Àpatlh 'arDIch?} might
> also get the message across; supposedly, it'd
> be a trunctated form of somethng like {patlh 'arDIch vIchavpu'K?B????àø?
¬??É%?£
ì?Í??µÌ?±¥­? an alright construction to me.
?F??26VçFVæ6R×W6W0 me greatly.
> >
?Y\H?^XZ??IË?XÚRB????]Z?[ÉÈ]?@' Hol, jey'egh mu'tlhegh.
????âõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõð___________________
???ÛN??Ø?[?Ý]Ø\?Ü?Ø?[??Z[?Àstart.ca]
> > Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 21:55
> À: tlhIngan-Hol
> ÝX??XÝ??N?Õ[?Ø[?ZÛH   Ø\?XÚ??>
?\ÈH]IÈ?IÈ[?[?Û\Ú?HÝË[X[?]È???ÛÝ[be understood, but different
ÛÛ?^\Ù[?Ú]]?HÛÛ][Û?s need to be found.
???Rærâ¶&6Rf­æ?6?Ò%v?Bw2my place??à£â? ÕÐ?ݽձ??å½Ô?Í?ä???É%? ?©% ü?½È?©% ?'arDIch? 
> ????à£â(ø?ø?=¸?ÈÌ´´ÈÔ°??Ð?ÜèÐä°?1¥?Øen <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
?£âãâF??2?2­çFW&W0ting - from an english point
Ù??Y]È]ÛÝ[?ÈÝ?[?ÙHto say "the
> how-many-est", but in German, it's completely normal to say "der wievielte". 
> >>
> ?HÛÝ[XØÙ\t {'arDIch} just like
> {'arlogh}. {'arDIch} sounds logic and will be
> understood. As long as Maltz doesn't say no, why should we?
> ??4´(ø?øø?1¥?Ù?¸?0¸?1¥Ñ??È( > aka Quvar valer 'utlh
??GG¢ò÷wwræf6V&öö²æ6öÒô¶Æ­æponteacher
> >>
> ??}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}|_______________
> >> Tlhingan-hol mailing list
?FÆ?­à[email protected]
> ???ÝÙK?YÚ]@lkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
> >
?×××××À_________________________________________
> [?Ø[?ZÀl mailing list
> [?Ø[?ZÛÝÙK?YÚ][Ú[?ÙÛK?Ü?Â?> ??ÝÙK?YÚ][Ú[?ÙÛK?Ü?ËÛXZ[X[?Û\Ý[??ËÝ@ngan-hol
>
××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××À__
>Tlhingan-hol mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol


_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
[email protected]
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol

_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
[email protected]
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol



_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
[email protected]
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol

Back to archive top level