tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Sep 05 09:24:26 2012
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] -Ha' on adverbs
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Rohan Fenwick - QeS 'utlh
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I would have thought wejHa' to mean "no longer, not any more", and while
> discussing it at the aforementioned breakfast ghunchu'wI' noted another
> potential meaning (I don't remember it, unfortunately) that was also
> logical.
Way back when we first had clues that {-Ha'} could be affixed to
adverbials, I proposed {wejHa'} as meaning "still". Someone
immediately answered saying he agreed completely, except that he would
understand it as "already". We quickly decided that it was not a
productive discussion.
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 5:20 AM, De'vID <[email protected]> wrote:
> If {DaHHa'} doesn't work, how else would you say "not now"?
I've always said {wej} for that meaning.
-- ghunchu'wI'
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
[email protected]
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol