tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jan 26 07:33:47 2012

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: [Tlhingan-hol] nuq bop bom: 'ay' wa'vatlh cha'maH Hut: <no' chavmey>

Lieven Litaer ([email protected])

From: Lieven Litaer <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] nuq bop bom: 'ay' wa'vatlh cha'maH Hut: <no' chavmey>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:33:39 +0100
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
List-archive: <http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol/>
List-id: <tlhingan-hol.stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
List-subscribe: <http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
References: <[email protected]> <CAFK8js0AxMwfao=ZTYM9Z5emYxTn=dG21grY01sVJMn5wUT1=g@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <C305E6BD33E2654DAE1F8F403247B6A603207867CAC5@EVS02.ad.uchicago.edu> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1

Am 24.01.2012 21:57, schrieb David Trimboli:

On the other hand, I am convinced that {Dotlh yIja'} is perfectly valid
for "report status!"


Oh, wejpuH: you are "convinced"?
You are now contradicting yourself.   ;-)

If I cannot {ja'} a {lut}, then you cannot {ja'} the {Dotlh}!

:-P   *plrrrrrr*

Lieven.

_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
[email protected]
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol

References:
- [Tlhingan-hol] nuq bop bom: 'ay' wa'vatlh cha'maH Hut: <no' chavmey>
  - From: Qov <[email protected]>
- Re: [Tlhingan-hol] nuq bop bom: 'ay' wa'vatlh cha'maH Hut: <no' chavmey>
  - From: "ghunchu'wI' 'utlh" <[email protected]>
- Re: [Tlhingan-hol] nuq bop bom: 'ay' wa'vatlh cha'maH Hut: <no' chavmey>
  - From: ghunchu'wI' <[email protected]>
- Re: [Tlhingan-hol] nuq bop bom: 'ay' wa'vatlh cha'maH Hut: <no' chavmey>
  - From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
- Re: [Tlhingan-hol] nuq bop bom: 'ay' wa'vatlh cha'maH Hut: <no' chavmey>
  - From: Lieven Litaer <[email protected]>
- Re: [Tlhingan-hol] nuq bop bom: 'ay' wa'vatlh cha'maH Hut: <no' chavmey>
  - From: Lieven Litaer <[email protected]>
- Re: [Tlhingan-hol] nuq bop bom: 'ay' wa'vatlh cha'maH Hut: <no' chavmey>
  - From: ghunchu'wI' <[email protected]>
- Re: [Tlhingan-hol] nuq bop bom: 'ay' wa'vatlh cha'maH Hut: <no' chavmey>
  - From: Qov <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Klingon Word of the Day: pu'jIn
Next by Date: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Newbie question about vIneHbogh construction
Previous by thread: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] nuq bop bom: 'ay' wa'vatlh cha'maH Hut: <no' chavmey>
Next by thread: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] nuq bop bom: 'ay' wa'vatlh cha'maH Hut: <no' chavmey>
Index(es):